Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Trials ; 23(1): 400, 2022 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1846860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This update describes changes to the Brief Educational Tool to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) trial in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS/DESIGN: The original protocol was published in Trials. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the BETTER trial converted to remote recruitment in April 2020. All recruitment, consent, enrollment, and randomization now occur by phone within 24 h of the acute care visit. Other changes to the original protocol include an expansion of inclusion criteria and addition of new recruitment sites. To increase recruitment numbers, eligibility criteria were expanded to include individuals with chronic pain, non-daily opioid use within 2 weeks of enrollment, presenting musculoskeletal pain (MSP) symptoms for more than 1 week, hospitalization in past 30 days, and not the first time seeking medical treatment for presenting MSP pain. In addition, recruitment sites were expanded to other emergency departments and an orthopedic urgent care clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting from an orthopedic urgent care clinic and transitioning to remote operations not only allowed for continued participant enrollment during the pandemic but also resulted in some favorable outcomes, including operational efficiencies, increased enrollment, and broader generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118595 . Registered on October 8, 2019.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain , COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Pain , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Pandemics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 14(1): 46, 2021 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, populations were advised to remain at home to control viral spread. Government-mandated restrictions on free movement affected individuals' engagement with physical activity, with reported increases leading to biopsychosocial health benefits and conversely increased sedentary behaviour leading to poorer health. Good foot health is key to enabling physical activity and maximal participation in activities of occupation and daily living. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was performed, using a web-based platform. Quantitative and qualitative data were captured through responses to closed and open survey questions. Anybody with a foot health condition was eligible to participate in the online survey. Links were sent through professional networks, support groups and charities, using a snowball strategy to maximise participation. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five respondents completed the survey. Most (n = 193, 75.69%) reported an ongoing foot pain or problem that had been present for 4 weeks or longer, whilst 49 respondents (19.22%) noted a new pain or problem. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (n = 139, 54.51%), whilst change in appearance of the foot was also commonly reported (n = 122, 47.84%), often alongside the observable presence of swelling. Musculoskeletal foot symptoms were frequently reported (n = 123, 48%), and were significantly associated with reported reduced physical activity (X2 = 6.61, p = 0.010). Following qualitative analysis five themes and 11 subthemes emerged, informed by 49 independent codes. A central theme of lockdown disrupting support networks, both formal (healthcare providers) and informal (friends or family members) emerged. The 5 sub-themes were: 1. foot pain is a constant companion, 2. self-care, 3. 'cope or crumble' scenarios, 4. future intent to access healthcare and 5. reduced ability to undertake physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Pain was the most frequently reported foot problem during COVID-19 lockdown restriction. Lockdown restrictions disrupted support networks integral to maintaining foot health. Poor foot health impacted people's ability to remain physically active. Complaints previously considered relatively 'minor' such as support for skin and nail care, were found to be exacerbated by restricted support networks, leading to greater negative impact.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Exercise/psychology , Foot/pathology , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Social Isolation/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Patient Participation , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sedentary Behavior , Self Care/psychology , Self-Help Groups/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL